Post the agreed information
Record payment, adjustment and remittance information according to the practice's approved billing workflow. Identify missing information instead of creating an explanation or assumption.
Konnext helps professional practices post and review insurance and patient payment information, adjustments and remittance details within the agreed billing workflow. We identify unmatched information and its next owner rather than treating an unexplained balance as resolved.
Related records, separate questions
Compare the available information
A remittance alone does not resolve every payment question.
Start with the payment information available, the approved posting workflow and the responsibilities your practice wants to discuss. This page describes focused billing support, not a new package, platform or accounting service.
Record payment, adjustment and remittance information according to the practice's approved billing workflow. Identify missing information instead of creating an explanation or assumption.
Compare available remittance and payment information with the agreed billing records. Keep discrepancies and unclear references visible for the responsible reviewer.
Record the unresolved item, available supporting information and next owner. Work outside the agreed posting scope requires a separate handoff.
Electronic remittance advice explains a payer's claim payment and adjustments; electronic funds transfer concerns moving payment. Related information needs review within the agreed workflow, rather than assuming one record confirms everything.
| Record or item | What it tells you | Question to resolve |
|---|---|---|
| Remittance information | The payer's explanation and available payment or adjustment detail. | Which related payment information is available for the agreed review? |
| Payment information | The reference or confirmation supplied through the approved process. | What has the responsible practice contact confirmed, and what is still unclear? |
| Posted billing record | Entries and adjustments recorded under the approved workflow. | Do they agree with the available supporting information? |
| Unmatched item | Missing, inconsistent or unclear information requiring attention. | Who owns the next clarification before the item is closed? |
These engagement steps organize the agreed work. They do not promise automated processing, a daily posting schedule, complete deposit matching or a financial outcome.
Identify the posting tasks, available records, approved adjustment rules, practice reviewer and permitted access before work begins.
Identify the remittance and payment information supplied through the approved process. Keep missing or unclear references visible.
Follow the approved billing workflow and compare the available records. Flag information needing clarification rather than assuming the balance is resolved.
Record the unmatched item, responsible contact and follow-up needed. Route additional billing, payer or practice decisions to their agreed owner.
Illustrative record, not a client result: remittance information is available, but the related payment reference is unclear. Available: the remittance record. Open: the missing payment information needed for the agreed review. Owner: the authorized practice contact, with agreed billing support. Next action: confirm the relevant record and retain the response before closing the item.
Review what posting support includes, how unmatched information is handled and which decisions stay with your practice. Use the existing billing inquiry to discuss the workflow you need.
The agreed scope identifies which insurance or patient payment information, adjustments and remittance details will be posted and reviewed. Unmatched information should have a responsible party and next action; it is not automatically treated as a resolved balance.
No. An electronic remittance advice explains the payer's claim payment and adjustments. An electronic funds transfer concerns moving payment. The related records need to be associated and reviewed through the approved workflow; a remittance alone does not settle every payment question.
This page describes billing-record and remittance review within an agreed workflow. It does not establish bookkeeping, a financial audit, bank-feed integration or authority to access accounts or move funds. Confirm the permitted information, access and responsibilities separately.
Record what is available, what is unclear, who needs to respond and the next action. Do not automatically close an unexplained item or make a refund, write-off or patient-balance decision outside the approved workflow and responsible review.
The existing billing assessment can help identify whether a focused posting workflow or a broader billing/RCM scope fits the practice's needs. The actual agreement determines included tasks, access, outputs and handoffs; this page does not establish a fixed package or service level.
No. Use the public inquiry for general business needs and the workflow you want to discuss. Do not send patient or claim records, remittances, bank information, identification documents, passwords or access credentials. Arrange an appropriate authorized handoff separately.
Confirm the practice, relevant systems and permitted access, payment/remittance information available, approved posting and review tasks, adjustment authority, expected administrative outputs, unmatched-item ownership, exclusions and separate costs. Any additional follow-up, accounting or transaction work needs an identified owner and appropriate agreement; no recovery amount or posting deadline is guaranteed.
Describe the general posting or unmatched-information concern and the support you want to explore. Use the existing billing inquiry to discuss scope and responsibilities, without sending financial, patient or claim records.